Loading the catalogue…
Loading the catalogue…
Anthropic's frontier Mythos-class model with always-on adaptive reasoning and a one-million-token context window, built for deep code and research analysis rather than real-time chat.
Overview. Claude Fable 5 is Anthropic's proprietary, closed-weight Mythos-class reasoning model, generally available since June 2026. It runs with mandatory, always-on adaptive reasoning and a one-million-token context window, accepting text and image input and returning text output. Developers reach for it when a task needs sustained, multi-step reasoning over large amounts of context rather than a fast conversational reply.
Key strengths. Artificial Analysis benchmarking places Fable 5 in frontier territory, with a Coding Index of 76.5 and an Intelligence Index that has moved up to 62.1 in the most recent reading, alongside an Agentic Index of 56.6. The model exposes native tool calling, structured output, and JSON mode, which makes it well suited to agentic pipelines that call functions and expect schema-constrained responses. Its five-tier reasoning effort control (max, xhigh, high, medium, low) lets a team trade latency for depth on harder problems.
When to use it. Use Fable 5 for long-context code review, multi-document research synthesis, and agentic workflows that chain tool calls and need structured JSON back. The one-million-token window and 128,000-token output ceiling suit large codebases or research corpora better than short back-and-forth chat. Because reasoning is always on and tuned for depth, it fits batch and asynchronous jobs more naturally than latency-sensitive, real-time interactions.
Limitations. Reasoning cannot be turned off and the model does not accept a temperature parameter, so it isn't a drop-in swap for lightweight conversational deployments that expect fast, low-effort responses. Anthropic has not disclosed parameter count, architecture details, or a training data cutoff for this model, and input support stops at text and image — there is no audio input or output. Its reasoning-first design points toward a batch-style latency profile rather than real-time chat.
Sovereignty note. Anthropic is a US-headquartered creator, so Fable 5 Inference carries CLOUD Act exposure rather than EU-residency protections; our research did not surface a published training-on-input opt-out or EU-specific data residency commitment for this model. It is a closed-weight, proprietary model governed by Anthropic's Acceptable Use Policy.
| Inference Provider | Sovereignty | Runs in | In / out per 1M | Status | Pin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L0 | €9.07 / 45.37+2 rates | Online |
15 use cases classified by the curator. The note says why.
1M-token context plus tool-calling and a 65 Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index score make this well-suited to deep, multi-file agentic coding sessions where reasoning depth outweighs latency cost.
Adaptive reasoning mode and huge context window suit tracing bugs across large codebases and long logs rather than isolated snippets.
Million-token context window allows full-repository ingestion for review, and the family's top-of-class intelligence index supports catching subtle structural issues.
1M-token context window directly targets long-document Q&A workloads that exceed most competitors' context limits.
Tool-calling capability plus high intelligence index score supports reliable structured function-calling applications.
Long-context design and top-tier intelligence index score (65) favor comprehensive cross-document literature synthesis over quick lookups.
Vision support enables chart interpretation, though throughput and cost trade-offs make it less ideal than lighter-weight vision models for routine chart tasks.
High reasoning quality supports complex analytical tasks, though premium pricing and below-average throughput make it a poor fit for high-volume analysis pipelines.
Vision capability is present, but the model's positioning around deep code/research analysis rather than fast multimodal interaction limits it to acceptable rather than strong for general image Q&A.
Strong reasoning and long context support large-scale refactors, but the $12.50/$50.00 per-token pricing and 60.3 tok/s throughput make it costly for iterative refactor loops.
Described as built for deep analysis 'rather than real-time chat'; 60.3 tokens/second throughput and premium pricing work against latency-sensitive support workloads.
No speech synthesis capability listed, and below-average throughput conflicts with the real-time responsiveness voice agents require.
Sourced numbers, not our own evaluations. Percentiles are against the whole Stav catalogue.
Computed from aa-intelligence-index, gpqa-diamond, aa-engineering-index, aa-coding-index, livecodebench, terminal-bench-v4, ifbench, aa-lcr.
curl https://api.stav.ai/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $STAV_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "anthropic/claude-fable-5",
"reasoning_effort": "high",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]
}'→ X-Stav-Request-Id · X-Stav-Model · X-Stav-Provider → X-Stav-Sovereignty-Level — the rung the request was served at