Loading the catalogue…
Loading the catalogue…
One of Anthropic's Claude Opus 4 models — a one-million-token context window, optional adaptive thinking, and native document understanding for reasoning-heavy and agentic work.
Overview. Claude Opus 4.6 is a proprietary, closed-weight model in Anthropic's Claude Opus 4 family, released in February 2026 — Anthropic has since released the higher-scoring Claude Opus 4.7 and Opus 4.8 within the same family. It pairs a one-million-token context window with a 128,000-token maximum output, and accepts text, images, and native PDF/document input alongside text output. Developers reach for it when a task calls for Anthropic's high-reasoning Opus tier, rather than the fastest or most economical option.
Key strengths. Opus 4.6 posted an Elo of 1497 on the LMSys Chatbot Arena leaderboard (ranked fourth as of Stav's last verified check), placing it in Stav's frontier quality tier. On Artificial Analysis's GPQA Diamond benchmark it scores 0.84, and on Humanity's Last Exam it scores 0.19 — strong absolute results for a general-purpose model. It also supports optional adaptive thinking with selectable effort levels (max, high, medium, low), letting a caller trade latency for deeper reasoning on demand.
When to use it. Use Opus 4.6 for reasoning-heavy and agentic workflows where output quality matters more than raw speed — complex multi-step tasks, long-document analysis, and research-style question answering all benefit from its full context window and adaptive thinking. Its native document and image understanding also make it a good fit for prompts that mix PDFs, screenshots, and text. With a median time-to-first-token around 2.4 seconds, it suits interactive use comfortably, though it isn't tuned for sub-second, high-throughput serving.
Limitations. Opus 4.6 is closed-weight and served only through Anthropic's own API and partner cloud platforms, so self-hosting or fine-tuning the base weights isn't possible. Its training data reaches through roughly August 2025, and it does not accept or produce audio.
Sovereignty note. Opus 4.6 is a proprietary, closed-weight model governed by Anthropic's Acceptable Use Policy and is available only via Anthropic's own hosted infrastructure or partner clouds, so data handling and residency depend on Anthropic's terms rather than a self-hosted deployment.
| Inference Provider | Sovereignty | Runs in | In / out per 1M | Status | Pin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L0 | €4.54 / 22.69+2 rates | Online |
43 use cases classified by the curator. The note says why.
Tool-calling, extended-thinking, and 1M-token context are the core requirements for agentic coding loops; the model is explicitly described as optimised for complex agentic workloads.
1M-token context combined with prompt-caching makes repeated answer generation over large static document sets efficient and highly accurate.
1M-token context enables full-document audit trail analysis; complex reasoning benchmarks support identifying inconsistencies across large, multi-document audit packages.
Family default is acceptable citing no browser-specific benchmark; Opus 4.6's documented BrowseComp performance plus tool-calling and vision provide concrete evidence for browser automation workflows, justifying an upgrade to strong.
Extended-thinking mode enables deliberate trace-through of complex call stacks and state; large context allows including full codebases and logs without truncation.
Native vision capability combined with strong analytical reasoning benchmarks makes this a confident pick for interpreting and explaining complex charts and visualisations.
Strong reasoning supports nuanced, multi-label classification, but flagship cost makes it over-specified for straightforward high-volume classification; optimal for complex taxonomy or low-volume critical classification.
High reasoning quality supports accurate completions, but latency and cost at flagship tier are typically prohibitive for inline IDE completion; better suited to batch or complex completion tasks.
Strong reasoning and tool-calling enable sophisticated support interactions, but flagship cost per turn is typically hard to justify for high-volume support unless complexity demands it.
Vision capability supports document OCR tasks, but dedicated OCR engines typically outperform general-purpose vision LLMs on raw character accuracy; suitable when OCR is combined with understanding tasks.
Fully capable but over-specified for most email drafting tasks; best justified when emails require synthesising large document sets or complex context.
1M-token context handles very long transcripts natively; however, flagship cost is hard to justify for routine meeting summaries unless summaries require deep analytical synthesis.
Sourced numbers, not our own evaluations. Percentiles are against the whole Stav catalogue.
Computed from aa-intelligence-index, gpqa-diamond, aa-engineering-index, aa-coding-index, livecodebench, terminal-bench-v4, ifbench, aa-multilingual-index, aa-lcr.
curl https://api.stav.ai/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $STAV_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "anthropic/claude-opus-4-6",
"reasoning_effort": "high",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]
}'→ X-Stav-Request-Id · X-Stav-Model · X-Stav-Provider → X-Stav-Sovereignty-Level — the rung the request was served at