Loading the catalogue…
Loading the catalogue…
Anthropic's frontier reasoning model with a 1M-token context, adjustable reasoning effort, and multimodal input for code, research, and long-document work.
Overview. Claude Opus 5 is Anthropic's flagship closed-weight reasoning model, built for developers who need a large context window and adjustable reasoning depth in one endpoint. It handles a 1M-token context with up to 128K tokens of output, and accepts text, image, and file input. As a reasoning-tuned variant, it exposes a configurable effort ladder (low, medium, high, xhigh, max) so callers can trade latency for depth on a per-request basis.
Key strengths. Opus 5 sits in Stav's frontier quality tier, in line with the sibling Opus 4.x generation's positioning. Its complexity fit is reasoning: extended thinking is enabled by default and tunable through the effort ladder, and it accepts document (file) and image input. Domain signal estimates put code among its strongest areas, it reaches up to 94% on GPQA Diamond (graduate-level science reasoning) at the highest effort settings, and it shows solid general-purpose and writing performance.
When to use it. Reach for Opus 5 when a task benefits from deep, adjustable reasoning — multi-step problem solving, code generation, or research synthesis over long documents that need the full 1M-token context. Use lower effort settings for interactive, latency-sensitive chat, and dial up to high/xhigh/max when correctness matters more than response time, such as complex agentic tool-use chains or legal/technical document review. Its file and image input support also make it a fit for document-heavy or multimodal workflows.
Limitations. Anthropic has not published a training data cutoff or architecture details for Opus 5, so exact knowledge freshness and parameter scale can't be confirmed. Output is text-only — there is no native audio or image generation — and the model's true response latency varies significantly across the reasoning effort ladder, from interactive at low effort to considerably longer at max effort.
Sovereignty note. Claude Opus 5 is a closed-weight model from Anthropic, a US company subject to the CLOUD Act. It is available only as a hosted API, with no self-hosted or open-weight distribution. Where requests run, and whether inputs are retained or used for training, depends on the endpoint serving it; see the endpoint facts on this page.
| Inference Provider | Sovereignty | Runs in | In / out per 1M | Status | Pin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L0 | €4.54 / 22.69+3 rates | Online | |||
| L0 | €4.99 / 24.96+1 rate | Active | |||
| L0 | €4.99 / 24.96+2 rates | Active |
50 use cases classified by the curator. The note says why.
Combines tool-calling, extended thinking, and a 1M-token context — the three requirements for sustained autonomous edit-test-debug loops over real repositories.
1M-token context supports stuffing large retrieved corpora rather than truncated top-k, with extended thinking for grounded multi-hop answering.
1M tokens accommodates full evidence bundles and control documentation; extended-thinking mode supports traceable reasoning chains that auditors can review.
Vision input for screenshot/DOM-render grounding combined with tool-calling matches the perceive-act loop browser agents require; extended thinking supports deliberate action selection.
Extended-thinking mode plus tool-calling lets the model form and test hypotheses across a large codebase held in context, rather than pattern-matching on a stack trace.
Vision input plus reasoning over charts, with long context to hold surrounding report text so the explanation is anchored to the document, not the image alone.
Highly capable but over-provisioned for most label-assignment workloads; smaller, cheaper models deliver comparable accuracy at a fraction of the cost.
Capable of high-quality completions, but inline completion demands sub-100ms latency that a frontier reasoning model does not target; better suited to agentic than keystroke-level use.
Technically capable with tool-calling for CRM lookups, but frontier-tier cost and US CLOUD Act exposure make it a poor default for high-volume customer chat versus a cheaper hosted tier.
High writing quality with tool-calling for calendar/CRM context, though the task is latency-sensitive and economically better suited to a mid-tier model.
Capable generator, but copy tasks rarely need frontier reasoning or 1M context — cost and latency favour a cheaper tier for high-volume variant production.
Strong summarisation over long transcripts, but no audio ingestion — an external ASR step is required, and transcript summarisation rarely justifies frontier pricing.
Semantic search requires an embedding model; Claude Opus 5 exposes no embedding endpoint, so it cannot serve the retrieval layer directly.
No TTS or audio output surface; not a viable component of a speech synthesis pipeline.
No audio input or ASR capability in the model profile; text and image modality only.
No real-time audio input or speech output; cannot serve the speech loop of a voice agent without an external STT/TTS stack and a latency budget it was not designed for.
No speech or audio generation capability — the model's outputs are text and structured content only.
Sourced numbers, not our own evaluations. Percentiles are against the whole Stav catalogue.
Computed from aa-intelligence-index, gpqa-diamond, aa-engineering-index, aa-coding-index, livecodebench, terminal-bench-v4, aa-lcr.
curl https://api.stav.ai/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $STAV_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "anthropic/claude-opus-5",
"reasoning_effort": "high",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]
}'→ X-Stav-Request-Id · X-Stav-Model · X-Stav-Provider → X-Stav-Sovereignty-Level — the rung the request was served at