Loading the catalogue…
Loading the catalogue…
Google's reasoning-tuned Flash model: multimodal input, a million-token-plus context window, and always-on chain-of-thought for agentic, long-horizon tasks.
Overview. Gemini 3.6 Flash is Google's reasoning-tuned Flash model, built on Gemini 3.5 Flash and released in July 2026. It accepts text, image, audio, and video input and returns text output, backed by a context window over one million tokens and a 65,536-token max output. Developers reach for it when a task needs Google's chain-of-thought reasoning applied to large, multimodal inputs without the footprint of a full Pro-tier model.
Key strengths. Independent benchmarking from Artificial Analysis shows a solid coding index (69.2) and a notably high GPQA Diamond score (0.93), indicating strong performance on graduate-level science reasoning and code-oriented tasks. Reasoning is mandatory and always on for this model rather than an optional flag, which aligns with its design for agentic, long-horizon workflows. Its broader intelligence index (40.3) and agentic index (30.3) land above the median for similarly priced reasoning models per Artificial Analysis, consistent with Flash being the cost/latency-optimized line rather than the top reasoning tier.
When to use it. Use Gemini 3.6 Flash for coding assistance, document and long-context analysis, or agentic tasks that benefit from an always-on chain-of-thought and can tolerate roughly ten to fifteen seconds of latency before the first token appears. It's a good fit when you need to reason over large multimodal inputs — long documents, images, audio, or video — within a single call. It is not the model to choose for pure realtime, low-latency conversational use, given its elevated time-to-first-token driven by mandatory reasoning.
Limitations. Output is text-only even though input spans text, image, audio, and video, so it cannot generate images, audio, or video itself. Google has not disclosed parameter count, architecture, or MoE-vs-dense status for this model, and its training data cutoff is understood to be around March 2026. Mandatory reasoning adds meaningful latency before the first token compared to non-reasoning Flash variants.
Sovereignty note. Gemini 3.6 Flash is a closed-weight, proprietary model served by Google as a commercial API. Current research did not surface specific findings on data residency, CLOUD Act exposure, or training-on-input policy for this model, so it should be treated as a standard commercial cloud deployment rather than a verified Sovereign offering.
| Inference Provider | Sovereignty | Runs in | In / out per 1M | Status | Pin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L0 | €0.66 / 3.30+3 rates | Online |
18 use cases classified by the curator. The note says why.
1M+ token context window is well suited to grounding answers directly in large retrieved document sets.
1,048,576-token context window allows ingesting entire large documents or document sets for direct Q&A without chunking.
Native vision capability plus long context supports detailed multimodal question answering over images.
Million-token-plus context enables holding numerous papers or documents in-context simultaneously for cross-referencing.
Configurable chain-of-thought reasoning combined with a million-token-plus context window fits long-horizon planning tasks well.
Extended-thinking mode plus massive context window suits synthesizing information across many long sources.
Extended-thinking mode and long context support multi-file coding agents, though no code-specific benchmark is provided.
Vision capability supports reading chart images, though this is not called out as a core strength in curation.
Vision input supports extracting structured data from chart images, consistent with multimodal capability.
Long context window enables reviewing large codebases at once, though no code-review benchmark is documented for this variant.
Reasoning-tuned chain-of-thought supports analytical breakdowns, though no data-analysis-specific benchmark is published.
Vision capability supports document image understanding, though OCR-specific accuracy is not documented.
Sourced numbers, not our own evaluations. Percentiles are against the whole Stav catalogue.
Computed from aa-intelligence-index, gpqa-diamond, aa-engineering-index, aa-coding-index, livecodebench, terminal-bench-v4, aa-lcr.
curl https://api.stav.ai/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $STAV_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "google/gemini-3.6-flash",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]
}'→ X-Stav-Request-Id · X-Stav-Model · X-Stav-Provider → X-Stav-Sovereignty-Level — the rung the request was served at