Loading the catalogue…
Loading the catalogue…
Mistral AI's dense 14B multimodal Instruct model with Apache-2.0 open weights, a 262,144-token context window and native tool calling.
Overview. Ministral 3 14B Instruct (2512) is Mistral AI's dense multimodal model, pairing a 13.5B language model with a 0.4B Pixtral-type vision encoder so it accepts text and images and returns text. It was released on 2025-12-02 under Apache-2.0 with public weights, as the instruction-tuned member of the Ministral 3 family. Developers reach for it when they want a compact model they can self-host, with a 262,144-token context window and native tool calling.
Key strengths. The vendor benchmarks on the model card put MATH Maj@1 at 0.904 and WildBench at 68.5, with Arena Hard at 0.551 — math and general chat quality that reads strong for a dense 14B model. The same card reports GPQA Diamond 0.57 and MMMU-Pro 0.50, suggesting the reasoning and vision paths hold up beyond text-only evaluation. Native function calling with tools and tool_choice is supported, along with structured outputs driven by JSON schema, and the tokenizer covers English, French, Spanish, German, Italian, Portuguese, Dutch, Chinese, Japanese, Korean and Arabic.
When to use it. Use this model for interactive work where roughly one-second first-token latency is acceptable: document and image question answering, structured extraction into JSON, and single-step tool calls. The 262,144-token context window suits long-document tasks that would otherwise need chunking. Keep it away from multi-step agentic loops — its agentic scores sit well below its general and math results, so orchestration-heavy workflows belong on a stronger reasoning model.
Limitations. The knowledge cutoff shipped in the vendor's own system prompt is 2023-10-01, so anything more recent may fall outside its training data. This is the Instruct checkpoint, not a reasoning model: it exposes no reasoning trace, and Mistral distributes a separate reasoning checkpoint for that role. Agentic reliability in multi-step tool use is the weakest measured area relative to its general capability.
Sovereignty note. Mistral AI is a French creator, and the Ministral 3 14B Instruct weights are published under Apache-2.0, so the model can be self-hosted or run on customer-managed infrastructure with no US CLOUD Act exposure. The active Stav endpoints for this model are operated from France and Switzerland.
| Inference Provider | Sovereignty | Runs in | In / out per 1M | Status | Pin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 | €0.20 / 0.20 | Online | |||
| L0 | €0.30 / 0.40 | Online |
40 use cases classified by the curator. The note says why.
Long-context grounding with vision support and prompt caching makes whole-corpus RAG answer generation cheap and structurally well-matched.
Long context ingests entire files and modules, and instruction tuning makes code walkthroughs a straightforward, low-cost workload.
262K context plus vision input covers text and scanned-page documents, enabling single-shot Q&A over full dossiers.
Structured-output support and the 262K context allow whole-document entity passes rather than chunked re-assembly, at a fraction of frontier-model cost.
Explicit tool-calling and structured-outputs support are first-class capabilities here, and the 262K context accommodates large function registries without truncation.
Native vision input on a 14B instruct model supports grounded visual question answering at low cost relative to frontier multimodal models.
Full-document context suits evidence review and summarisation for audits, with the caveat that the 14B tier is not a compliance-authoritative reasoner.
Long context can hold the failing module and trace outputs together; 14B reasoning depth limits root-cause analysis on subtle defects.
Can describe and reason over chart images via vision input; depth of quantitative interpretation is bounded by the 14B parameter budget.
Vision plus structured outputs suits pulling values from charts, though dense 14B visual perception is weaker than larger multimodal alternatives.
14B dense instruct with structured outputs handles label assignment competently; no published benchmark data, so validate task-specific accuracy before displacing larger models.
A 14B dense instruct model is serviceable for inline completion, but dedicated code models outperform it on multi-line and repository-aware suggestions.
Vision and tool-calling give partial grounding for screenshot-driven control, but there is no browser-native action schema or demonstrated web-agent performance.
No cross-encoder or dedicated relevance-scoring capability; latency and cost per candidate pair are poor versus purpose-built rerankers.
Text generation only — no TTS capability.
No audio input or ASR capability in the model card; this is a text-and-vision model.
No speech synthesis, transcription, or real-time audio capability listed — the model cannot serve as a voice pipeline component on its own.
No audio generation or speaker-conditioning capability.
Sourced numbers, not our own evaluations. Percentiles are against the whole Stav catalogue.
Computed from aa-intelligence-index, gpqa-diamond, aa-engineering-index, aa-coding-index, livecodebench, terminal-bench-v4, ifbench, aa-multilingual-index, aa-lcr.
curl https://api.stav.ai/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $STAV_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "mistral-ai/ministral-14b-2512",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]
}'→ X-Stav-Request-Id · X-Stav-Model · X-Stav-Provider → X-Stav-Sovereignty-Level — the rung the request was served at