Loading the catalogue…
Loading the catalogue…
Mistral AI's Apache-2.0 Ministral 3 3B Instruct model: text and image in, text out, 256k context, built for fast simple workloads.
Overview. ministral-3b-2512 is Mistral AI's Ministral 3 3B Instruct checkpoint from the December 2025 release: a dense 3.4B language model paired with a 0.4B Pixtral-type vision encoder, for a combined 3.85B parameters. It accepts text and images and returns text, with a 262,144-token context window, native function calling, and public weights under Apache-2.0. Developers reach for it when a small multimodal instruct model is enough and local or customer-managed weight deployment matters.
Key strengths. The useful signal here is architectural rather than leaderboard-based: no MMLU, Arena, or HumanEval figures are published for this checkpoint in the research used for this page. What is confirmed is a long 256k context window on a 3B-class dense model, native vision via the Pixtral-type encoder, native function calling, and an instruct post-train that accepts a system prompt. Apache-2.0 open weights make the same checkpoint available for self-hosting as well as hosted Inference.
When to use it. Use this for simple, latency-sensitive work — classification, short drafting, image captioning, and light tool calls — when a realtime 3B-class model is the right fit and multi-hop reasoning is not required. Prefer a larger Ministral sibling or a dedicated reasoning checkpoint when accuracy on constrained tasks matters more than size.
Limitations. This is an instruct checkpoint, not a reasoning model: it does not emit extended thinking traces, and Mistral AI ships chain-of-thought work on a separate Ministral 3 3B Reasoning release. The vendor-stated knowledge cutoff is 1 October 2023. There is no documented audio input or output and no native web search. JSON-schema constrained decoding is not documented for this checkpoint, while the shipped chat template renders multiple tool calls in a single turn.
Sovereignty note. Mistral AI is a French creator headquartered in Paris; it is not a US-parented company, though a US affiliate means CLOUD Act exposure is not categorically excluded. This release is open weights under Apache-2.0, so teams can run it in their own environment. On Stav it is served through the Mistral endpoint; confirm the endpoint's data-residency region and serving tier for regulated workloads. The vendor system prompt does not state a training-on-input policy for hosted calls.
| Inference Provider | Sovereignty | Runs in | In / out per 1M | Status | Pin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 | €0.10 / 0.10 | Online |
18 use cases classified by the curator. The note says why.
131K context and European proprietary deployment fit RAG answer generation when retrieved bundles stay inside the window and answers are mostly extractive.
Compact instruction-tuned models routinely handle label assignment well; Ministral-3B is a reasonable cheap classifier when prompt schemas stay short and classes are well-defined.
Cost/sovereignty-oriented 3B chat model with 131K context is adequate for FAQ-style support bots when accuracy is validated in-domain; not a class leader on hard multi-turn reasoning.
Long context on a sovereignty-friendly Mistral stack suits straightforward document Q&A over policies or manuals; 3B reasoning depth will lag larger models on multi-hop questions.
Adequate for short professional drafts and reply suggestions at low inference cost; creative polish and long multi-section emails will be weaker than larger Mistral tiers.
Lightweight NER-style spans and key-value pulls are in range for a 3B tool-capable model; pair with constrained decoding or tools for production reliability.
No coding benchmarks and small parameter count make this a poor primary choice for repository-scale agentic coding loops despite basic tool-calling.
Vision/OCR is not in the capability set; text-only model.
No vision capability is listed; cannot perform image Q&A.
Tool-calling exists, but a 3B-scale model without published planning or agent benchmarks is a weak default for reliable multi-step plans versus larger reasoning models.
No audio or speech capabilities; unsuitable for transcription.
Sourced numbers, not our own evaluations. Percentiles are against the whole Stav catalogue.
Computed from aa-intelligence-index, gpqa-diamond, aa-engineering-index, aa-coding-index, livecodebench, terminal-bench-v4, ifbench, aa-multilingual-index, aa-lcr.
curl https://api.stav.ai/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $STAV_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "mistral-ai/ministral-3b-2512",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]
}'→ X-Stav-Request-Id · X-Stav-Model · X-Stav-Provider → X-Stav-Sovereignty-Level — the rung the request was served at