Loading the catalogue…
Loading the catalogue…
Mistral AI's offline Voxtral Mini Transcribe 2 model for multilingual speech-to-text with timestamps, speaker diarization, and structured output.
Overview. Voxtral Mini Transcribe 2 is Mistral AI's offline speech-to-text model, released on 4 February 2026 in the Voxtral Transcribe 2 family (API id voxtral-mini-2602). It takes audio plus optional request parameters (diarization, context bias, language, and timestamp granularity) and returns transcription text, not general chat. Developers use it for file or clip transcription when they need timestamps, language detection, speaker diarization, and structured text rather than a streaming voice model.
Key strengths. Vendor documentation describes word-level timestamps, language detection, speaker diarization, context biasing for domain vocabulary, and structured output. Mistral reports it processes audio roughly three times faster than a comparable transcription model, so a finished file comes back faster than realtime. Coverage is multilingual across the 13 languages Mistral documents: English, Chinese, Hindi, Spanish, Arabic, French, Portuguese, Russian, German, Japanese, Korean, Italian, and Dutch.
When to use it. Use this for offline transcription of recordings when you need speaker-aware or structured text and interactive turnaround is enough. It fits simple speech-to-text work, not multi-step reasoning, coding, or agent workflows. The Smart Router places it in the low general-quality tier with an interactive latency class and a simple complexity fit, because domain signal is concentrated on spoken-language communication and is weak for code, math, and agentic tasks.
Limitations. This is the offline Mini Transcribe model, not the streaming Realtime sibling, so it does not provide a live token stream. It has no tool calling, vision input, audio output, or extended thinking; transcription features are steered by request parameters rather than free-text instructions. Parameter count, context window, training cutoff, and public weights for this exact API id were not confirmed, so treat it as a hosted transcription model until those details are published.
| Inference Provider | Sovereignty | Runs in | Price | Status | Pin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 | €0.00299 per audio minute | Online |
20 use cases classified by the curator. The note says why.
Voxtral line is Mistral’s dedicated audio/speech model family; the mini 2602 variant is purpose-built for speech-to-text with a practical 16K context for utterance and short-session transcription.
Audio-native Voxtral architecture plus compact mini sizing makes it a natural fit for low-latency voice-agent pipelines where speech understanding is the core loop.
Small dedicated model profile is a solid match for lightweight classification of text or transcribed audio labels.
Voice-oriented mini model can back audio-enabled support flows; text-only chatbot depth is limited by unpublished size and lack of flagged reasoning extras.
Competent for extracting entities from short transcripts or messages within the 16K window; not sized for very long multi-doc extraction.
16K context supports short-to-medium meeting audio after transcription; mini tier is competent for summarise-from-transcript workflows though not ideal for multi-hour recordings.
Mini speech-aware model can map short audio-derived or text inputs into structured fields when schemas are simple.
16K context window is adequate for short-document and transcript summarisation; mini tier remains competent when cost and speed dominate.
No code-agent tooling, extended thinking, or SWE-Bench signal; 16K context and audio-first design work against repository-scale agentic coding.
Lacks flagged tool use, vision, and agentic planning signals required for reliable browser control loops.
Audio-first mini model with modest context and no coding benchmarks is a weak default versus dedicated code models.
OCR and document vision are out of scope—no vision flags and audio-centric design.
No vision capability flagged; Voxtral mini is audio-oriented, not an image-understanding model.
16K window and lack of research-scale reasoning signal make multi-paper literature review a poor match.
Sourced numbers, not our own evaluations. Percentiles are against the transcription models on Stav.
No benchmark source yet
curl https://api.stav.ai/v1/audio/transcriptions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $STAV_API_KEY" \
-F model="mistral-ai/voxtral-mini-2602" \
-F file="@meeting.mp3"→ X-Stav-Request-Id · X-Stav-Model · X-Stav-Provider → X-Stav-Sovereignty-Level — the rung the request was served at