Loading the catalogue…
Loading the catalogue…
Mistral AI's open-weight flagship: a 675B-parameter (41B active) Granular MoE model with native vision input, function calling, and a 262,144-token context window, built for long-document and multimodal workflows.
Overview. Mistral Large 3 is Mistral AI's open-weight flagship: a 675B-parameter Granular sparse Mixture-of-Experts model with 41B active parameters and a native 2.5B-parameter vision encoder, released under Apache-2.0. It ships with a 262,144-token context window and is served via vLLM with the mistral-common tokenizer. Developers who need open, self-hostable weights alongside multimodal (text and image) input and native function calling would reach for this model.
Key strengths. The Granular MoE design keeps active compute at 41B parameters while retaining a 675B-parameter total capacity, which is the main efficiency lever of this release. It accepts text and image input natively through its built-in vision encoder, and Mistral documents native function calling, JSON outputting, and system-prompt adherence as core capabilities. The 262,144-token context window supports long-document and extended multi-turn workflows without external chunking.
When to use it. Use this model for long-document analysis, multimodal tasks that combine text with images, and general instruct workloads where medium task complexity and open weights matter more than top-tier reasoning or coding performance. It's a reasonable default when a team wants an Apache-2.0 licensed, self-hostable model with native tool calling and JSON output for integration into existing pipelines. It is not the model to reach for on heavy agentic or coding-intensive tasks, where independent capability signals in our research place it below top-tier frontier models.
Limitations. Coding and agentic capability signals gathered in research sit below what we'd expect from a top-tier frontier model, so this isn't the right choice for demanding multi-step coding or agent workflows. Mistral has not published a training data cutoff date, and details such as the number of experts per layer and how many are routed per token remain undisclosed. There's also no documented extended-thinking or reasoning-trace mode in this instruct release.
Sovereignty note. Mistral AI is based in France, giving this model no CLOUD Act exposure. Combined with Apache-2.0 open weights, it can be self-hosted for deployments that need direct control over data residency and Sovereign inference.
| Inference Provider | Sovereignty | Runs in | In / out per 1M | Status | Pin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 | €0.49 / 1.48 | Online |
48 use cases classified by the curator. The note says why.
Prompt-caching and 262K context make retrieval-augmented generation highly efficient; 675B reasoning depth reduces hallucination risk on complex multi-document queries.
Large context enables ingestion of full stack traces, logs, and relevant source files simultaneously; 675B reasoning depth supports root-cause analysis in complex multi-component systems.
Native vision and 675B reasoning depth enable detailed, accurate explanations of complex charts and data visualisations.
262K context allows explanation of large, interconnected codebases in full; 675B reasoning depth produces accurate, detailed technical explanations for complex logic.
Native vision input combined with a 262K context window supports OCR-style extraction from long, image-heavy documents.
262K context window with native vision input directly supports long-document Q&A over enterprise files without chunking.
Long context and sovereign deployment suit audit workflows, though the family's 15.9 quality index trails frontier reasoning models for nuanced audit judgment.
Tool-calling and vision capabilities support browser automation pipelines; 41B active parameters provide capable instruction-following, though latency at self-hosted 675B scale may be a constraint.
Vision input plus long context can support chart data extraction, though no chart-specific benchmark is cited.
Highly accurate at complex classification tasks, but 675B scale is operationally heavy for high-throughput classification; best reserved for high-stakes or nuanced categorisation.
Highly capable at completion tasks, but 675B self-hosted inference introduces latency that makes it suboptimal vs. smaller dedicated completion models for interactive IDE use.
262K context supports reviewing large diffs/files, though no SWE-Bench or code-specific score is available to confirm strong-tier ranking.
No coding-specific benchmark is cited and the family's 15.9 quality index trails frontier coding models, making this a weaker fit for autonomous coding agents.
Quality index of 15.9 trails frontier reasoning models, making it a weaker choice for complex multi-step agentic planning despite tool-calling support.
No text-to-speech capability documented; speech synthesis requires dedicated audio generation models.
No audio input capability documented; transcription requires dedicated speech-to-text models.
No audio input/output capability; voice agent use cases require speech processing that this model does not support.
No audio generation capability; voice cloning is outside this model's documented capability set.
Sourced numbers, not our own evaluations. Percentiles are against the whole Stav catalogue.
Computed from aa-intelligence-index, gpqa-diamond, aa-engineering-index, aa-coding-index, livecodebench, terminal-bench-v4, ifbench, aa-multilingual-index, aa-lcr.
curl https://api.stav.ai/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $STAV_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "mistralai/mistral-large-3-675b-instruct-2512",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]
}'→ X-Stav-Request-Id · X-Stav-Model · X-Stav-Provider → X-Stav-Sovereignty-Level — the rung the request was served at