Loading the catalogue…
Loading the catalogue…
Moonshot AI's open-weights, always-reasoning 2.8T MoE flagship with a 1M-token context, native tool use, and multimodal input.
Overview. Kimi K3 is Moonshot AI's open-weights flagship, a mixture-of-experts model with 2.8 trillion total parameters and 104 billion active per token, built on a KDA and Gated MLA attention hybrid with a MoonViT-V2 vision tower. Reasoning is always on — it cannot be turned off — and the model supports a 1,048,576-token context window, one of the largest available today. Developers reach for it when a task demands frontier-level reasoning depth across long documents, images, and video, backed by full open weights for self-hosting.
Key strengths. Moonshot's own evaluation table puts Kimi K3 at 93.5 on GPQA Diamond, 88.3 on Terminal-Bench 2.1, and 84.8 on OSWorld-Verified, placing it among frontier-class models on graduate-level science reasoning and long-horizon agentic tasks. Independent measurement from Artificial Analysis at maximum reasoning effort shows a Coding score of 76.2 and an Agentic score of 50, corroborating strength on real coding and tool-use workflows. It also performs well on browsing and document benchmarks (BrowseComp 91.2, OmniDocBench 91.1), reflecting its always-on reasoning trace together with native tool calling and structured output.
When to use it. Use Kimi K3 for reasoning-heavy work — multi-step coding, agentic tool-use, research and browsing tasks, and math or science problems — where the always-on thinking process and million-token context help rather than hinder. It's a strong fit when you need to reason over very large documents, codebases, or long conversation histories in a single call, or when a task mixes text with images. Because reasoning is mandatory and defaults to maximum effort, expect batch-style latency rather than fast conversational turnaround, so it suits asynchronous pipelines better than latency-sensitive chat.
Limitations. Reasoning cannot be disabled and defaults to the highest effort level, so every call carries visible chain-of-thought overhead that adds latency compared with non-reasoning models. Temperature is fixed at 1.0 and cannot be adjusted, and Moonshot has not published a training-data cutoff date. The model also has no audio input or output support.
Sovereignty note. Kimi K3 is created by Moonshot AI and ships as open weights, so teams can self-host it on Sovereign infrastructure for full control over data residency and processing. Available findings don't confirm CLOUD Act exposure or a training-on-input policy for any specific hosted endpoint, so that should be checked per endpoint before relying on it for regulated workloads.
| Inference Provider | Sovereignty | Runs in | In / out per 1M | Status | Pin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L2 | €2.72 / 13.61 | Online | |||
| L1 | €2.70 / 13.50 | Online | |||
| L1 | €3.00 / 15.00 | Online | |||
| L0 | €2.59 / 12.93 | Online | |||
| L0 | €2.72 / 13.61 | Online | |||
| L0 | €4.08 / 20.42 | Online |
16 use cases classified by the curator. The note says why.
2.8T MoE with 104B active params, extended-thinking, and tool-calling — designed for long-horizon agentic coding tasks with 1M-token context for full-repo awareness.
Extended-thinking mode paired with large-scale MoE reasoning capacity fits systematic root-cause debugging workflows.
1M context plus reasoning mode allows reviewing large diffs or entire codebases in a single pass.
1,048,576-token context window allows ingesting entire large document sets for single-pass Q&A without chunking.
Explicit tool-calling capability at flagship scale (2.8T MoE, 104B active) supports reliable structured function-call generation.
Vision capability with image and video input supports detailed visual question answering.
Flagship reasoning-first architecture (104B active params) is capable but always-on extended-thinking adds latency versus completion-optimized models.
Extended-thinking reasoning aids structured analytical tasks, though no data-analysis-specific benchmarks are cited.
Vision input support enables document image understanding, though OCR-specific benchmark data is not provided.
Sourced numbers, not our own evaluations. Percentiles are against the whole Stav catalogue.
Computed from aa-intelligence-index, gpqa-diamond, aa-engineering-index, aa-coding-index, livecodebench, terminal-bench-v4, aa-lcr.
curl https://api.stav.ai/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $STAV_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "moonshotai/kimi-k3",
"reasoning_effort": "high",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]
}'→ X-Stav-Request-Id · X-Stav-Model · X-Stav-Provider → X-Stav-Sovereignty-Level — the rung the request was served at