Loading the catalogue…
Loading the catalogue…
OpenAI's open-weight, reasoning-tuned Mixture-of-Experts model — Apache-2.0 licensed, 131K context, self-hostable.
Overview. gpt-oss-120b is OpenAI's open-weight, Apache-2.0 licensed reasoning model, released in August 2025 as the company's first meaningful open-weight release since GPT-2. It's a Mixture-of-Experts architecture with 117B total parameters and 128 experts, but only 5.1B parameters activate per token via top-4 routing, giving it a 131,072-token context window at a fraction of the compute cost of a dense model that size. Developers reach for it when they want OpenAI-grade reasoning behavior with the option to self-host, rather than being limited to a closed API.
Key strengths. The model is reasoning-tuned: it produces a visible chain-of-thought before its final answer, with a configurable effort level (low, medium, or high) that lets a caller trade latency for depth. Its MoE design is built for efficient serving despite the large total parameter count, which fits interactive, chat-style Inference workloads rather than heavy batch-only pipelines. Early signal suggests relative strength on math- and reasoning-oriented tasks compared with general writing or agentic tool-use scenarios, though this hasn't yet been confirmed against a full benchmark suite and should be treated as directional rather than definitive.
When to use it. Use gpt-oss-120b when a task benefits from an explicit, inspectable reasoning trace — multi-step math, logic puzzles, or problems where you want to dial reasoning effort up or down. It's also the model to reach for when open weights matter: teams that need to self-host, fine-tune, or run Inference on their own infrastructure for compliance or control reasons can do so under its Apache-2.0 licence. It is not built for image, audio, or document inputs, so route those workloads elsewhere.
Limitations. The model is text-in, text-out only — no vision, audio, or native document understanding. Its training data cutoff is roughly mid-2024, so it won't have knowledge of more recent events. Chain-of-thought reasoning is mandatory rather than optional, which means even simple queries incur some reasoning overhead, and tool-calling support exists in the model's format but hasn't been confirmed as a fully wired capability on every served endpoint.
Sovereignty note. gpt-oss-120b is created by OpenAI, a US company, and the currently configured endpoint runs on a US-based inference provider, so standard CLOUD Act exposure applies to that hosted path. Because the model is released under an open Apache-2.0 licence, organizations that need Sovereign, EU-resident Inference can instead self-host the weights on infrastructure of their own choosing rather than relying solely on the vendor-hosted endpoint.
| Inference Provider | Sovereignty | Runs in | In / out per 1M | Status | Pin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L3 | €0.15 / 0.60 | Online | |||
| L3 | €1.00 / 4.20 | Online | |||
| L2 | €0.14 / 0.54 | Online | |||
| L1 | €0.08 / 0.40 | Online | |||
| L1 | €0.15 / 0.55 | Online | |||
| L1 | €0.15 / 0.65 | Online | |||
| L1 | €0.20 / 0.80 | Online | |||
| L0 | €0.03 / 0.15 | Online | |||
| L0 | €0.14 / 0.54 | Online |
12 use cases classified by the curator. The note says why.
Explicit tool-calling capability is the core requirement for function-calling applications, and the large context window supports complex schemas.
Native tool-calling support plus a 131K context window make this a solid open-weights choice for orchestrating multi-tool agent workflows.
Tool-calling plus 131K context enables iterative code-agent workflows, though no SWE-Bench or coding benchmark scores are published for this variant.
Tool-calling capability supports action-execution loops typical of browser agents, but no benchmark or agentic-eval data is available to confirm reliability at scale.
131K context window can hold large diffs or files for review, but no code-specific benchmark scores are documented to confirm accuracy.
Large 131K context window suits question-answering over lengthy documents, though curated benchmark evidence is absent for this specific size variant.
131K context supports ingesting long transcripts for summarisation, a reasonable fit given the context length alone.
Tool-calling and long context support agentic planning loops, though no benchmark or reasoning-trace evidence is published to confirm strong planning depth.
Sourced numbers, not our own evaluations. Percentiles are against the whole Stav catalogue.
Computed from aa-intelligence-index, gpqa-diamond, aa-engineering-index, aa-coding-index, livecodebench, terminal-bench-v4, ifbench, aa-multilingual-index, aa-lcr, helm-safety-bbq, helm-safety-harm-bench, helm-safety-anthropic-red-team, helm-safety-simple-safety-tests, helm-safety-xstest, do-not-answer, realtoxicityprompts.
curl https://api.stav.ai/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $STAV_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "openai/gpt-oss-120b",
"reasoning_effort": "high",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]
}'→ X-Stav-Request-Id · X-Stav-Model · X-Stav-Provider → X-Stav-Sovereignty-Level — the rung the request was served at