Loading the catalogue…
Loading the catalogue…
Z.ai's 754B-parameter open-weight MoE model with integrated reasoning, built for long-horizon agentic engineering and state-of-the-art coding benchmark performance.
Overview. GLM-5.1 was Z.ai's flagship open-weight model at launch, a 754-billion-parameter Mixture-of-Experts architecture that activates roughly 40 billion parameters per token. Released in April 2026 under the MIT licence, it was purpose-built for long-horizon agentic engineering work, pairing a 200K-token context window with integrated reasoning that runs automatically on every request. Developers reach for it when a task needs sustained, multi-step problem-solving rather than a single quick answer.
Key strengths. GLM-5.1 posted a state-of-the-art SWE-Bench Pro score of 58.4, a clear jump from its predecessor's 55.1, putting it among the strongest models available for real-world software engineering tasks. Its post-training pipeline combines supervised fine-tuning on agentic and coding data with reinforcement learning specifically targeted at reasoning and tool-use, which shows up as consistently strong performance on code and agentic benchmarks. The reasoning is always-on and structured, letting the model iterate on a problem internally before producing output.
When to use it. Use GLM-5.1 for complex coding and software-engineering tasks that benefit from deep, multi-step reasoning — refactors, multi-file changes, or agentic tool-loop workflows where the model needs to plan and revise across several turns. It fits batch or asynchronous pipelines well, since the always-on reasoning trace and large 131K-token output ceiling favour throughput over sub-second responsiveness. It's a strong choice when engineering quality matters more than raw response speed.
Limitations. Reasoning is baked in with no user-selectable effort toggle, so you can't dial it down for latency-sensitive, low-complexity calls the way you can with later GLM releases. The model is text-only, with no vision or audio input or output support, and Z.ai has not published a training data cutoff date. It has also been superseded by newer GLM-5.2 and GLM-5.3 releases, though it remains fully supported.
Sovereignty note. GLM-5.1's weights are released under the MIT licence and are openly downloadable, so organisations that need full control over data handling can self-host it on their own Sovereign infrastructure rather than depending on a third-party API's training-on-input or residency policies.
| Inference Provider | Sovereignty | Runs in | In / out per 1M | Status | Pin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L2 | €1.26 / 3.95 | Online | |||
| L0 | €1.26 / 3.95 | Online |
15 use cases classified by the curator. The note says why.
Tool-calling + extended-thinking enable iterative code generation and debugging loops; 200K context supports large codebases and error traces.
200K context enables full-document ingestion without chunking; extended-thinking supports synthesis across multiple sections.
200K context window directly addresses long-document retrieval and multi-passage reasoning; extended-thinking enhances answer quality on complex documents.
Native tool-calling support is the primary requirement; 200K context handles complex function graphs and state management.
Extended-thinking capability directly supports sequential reasoning and plan decomposition; 200K context accommodates intermediate state and reasoning traces.
Tool-calling capability + 200K context window enables complex multi-tool workflows; extended-thinking support enhances planning across tool chains.
Tool-calling support enables web interaction primitives; extended-thinking aids step navigation, though lack of vision capability limits screenshot-based feedback loops.
200K context allows explanation of large functions and modules in single pass; extended-thinking supports reasoning about complex logic.
200K context handles full-file codebases and change-sets; tool-calling could support linting/testing integration, though SWE-Bench performance is unknown.
Large context window reduces need for iterative summarization; extended-thinking aids comparative analysis across papers.
200K context window supports extended narratives; extended-thinking can structure complex arguments, though no specific generative-writing benchmarks are available.
200K context accommodates full meeting transcripts; extended-thinking can synthesize multi-topic discussions.
Sourced numbers, not our own evaluations. Percentiles are against the whole Stav catalogue.
Computed from aa-intelligence-index, gpqa-diamond, aa-engineering-index, aa-coding-index, livecodebench, terminal-bench-v4, ifbench, aa-lcr.
curl https://api.stav.ai/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $STAV_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "zai-org/glm-5-1",
"reasoning_effort": "high",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]
}'→ X-Stav-Request-Id · X-Stav-Model · X-Stav-Provider → X-Stav-Sovereignty-Level — the rung the request was served at