Loading the catalogue…
Loading the catalogue…
A million-token-context, mixture-of-experts reasoning model from DeepSeek with adjustable thinking effort, served on the Stav Platform via Fireworks AI.
Key strengths. The model's defining feature is its hybrid thinking/non-thinking design: callers can dial reasoning effort up or down per request rather than always paying for maximum deliberation. It is built and documented around agentic and coding reasoning workloads, and Stav's routing signals rate it strongest on code, with agentic tasks well behind. Its context window — over a million tokens — lets it hold entire codebases, long transcripts, or multi-document research sets in a single call.
When to use it. Use this model for coding and agentic tasks that benefit from adjustable reasoning depth, such as multi-step debugging, code review across a large repository, or research synthesis over long documents. Its fast initial response times and strong coding benchmark scores make it a reasonable default for reasoning-heavy work where you don't need a flagship-tier model for every request. Reach for the high or max reasoning-effort setting when task complexity justifies the extra generation time, and low effort for routine, lower-stakes calls.
| Inference Provider | Sovereignty | Runs in | In / out per 1M | Status | Pin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L3 | €0.40 / 0.80 | Online | |||
| L1 | €0.12 / 0.38 | Online | |||
| L0 | €0.05 / 0.16 | Online |
11 use cases classified by the curator. The note says why.
The 1M-token context window allows ingesting entire large documents or document sets for single-pass Q&A.
Native tool-calling capability is the core requirement for function-calling application design.
A 1,048,576-token context window is well above typical long-form document generation needs.
1M-token context window enables summarizing very long inputs without chunking.
Explicit tool-calling support combined with a 1,048,576-token context window supports complex multi-tool orchestration workflows.
Tool-calling plus 1M-token context enables large-repo agentic workflows, though no SWE-bench or coding-specific scores are published.
Large context window suits RAG pipelines requiring full-document grounding, though retrieval-specific performance is unverified.
Tool-calling support is a baseline requirement for browser automation agents; no task-specific benchmark data is available yet to confirm reliability.
Tool-calling plus a massive context window supports maintaining long agentic plans, though no planning-specific benchmarks are published.
No CLOUD Act exposure and open-weights status support data sovereignty requirements common in policy/compliance deployments, though no compliance-specific benchmarks are published.
Extremely large context window supports synthesizing across many source documents, though no reasoning benchmarks are published to confirm synthesis quality.
Sourced numbers, not our own evaluations. Percentiles are against the whole Stav catalogue.
Computed from aa-intelligence-index, gpqa-diamond, aa-engineering-index, aa-coding-index, livecodebench, terminal-bench-v4, aa-lcr.
curl https://api.stav.ai/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $STAV_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "deepseek-ai/deepseek-v4-flash-0731",
"reasoning_effort": "high",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]
}'→ X-Stav-Request-Id · X-Stav-Model · X-Stav-Provider → X-Stav-Sovereignty-Level — the rung the request was served at