Loading the catalogue…
Loading the catalogue…
An 8B multimodal reranker from Qwen that scores text and image relevance across a 32,768-token input context.
Overview. Qwen3-VL-Reranker-8B is an 8B multimodal reranking model from Qwen. It accepts text and image inputs, including screenshots, and returns relevance scores rather than generated text. Developers would reach for it to rank multimodal search or retrieval results against a query.
Key strengths. Its reranking design produces relevance scores for comparing candidate results against an input query. The model supports text and image inputs, with the model card also documenting screenshot and video inputs, making it suitable for retrieval tasks that combine language with visual content. It provides a 32,768-token input context.
When to use it. Use this model when a retrieval pipeline needs to reorder text or image candidates by relevance to a query. It fits multimodal search flows where screenshots or other visual content must be considered alongside text. Use it for scoring and ranking rather than open-ended response generation.
Limitations. No benchmark results, latency classification, domain scores, or training-data cutoff were verified for this model. Its documented output is a relevance score, and no evidence establishes streaming, tool calling, structured output, or native document-file handling.
Sovereignty note. Qwen is the creator, and the available findings do not establish a CLOUD Act exposure classification or a training-on-input policy. An IONOS endpoint is documented as hosted in Germany, but the endpoint's broader data-handling policy was not verified.
| Inference Provider | Sovereignty | Runs in | Price | Status | Pin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L1 | €0.04 per 1M input tokens | Online |
7 use cases classified by the curator. The note says why.
Purpose-built multimodal reranker at 8B parameters with vision input and a 32K context window, aligned with second-stage relevance scoring over mixed text and image candidates. The family's text-reranker lineage supports this, though the model is still in draft status.
Useful as a rescoring stage over candidates from an upstream embedding retriever, but its reranker design does not by itself provide first-pass dense retrieval. Suitability depends on the retrieval pipeline it sits behind.
A reranker scores and orders candidate passages rather than generating answers, and the listing shows no generative or chat capability. Pair it with a generation model downstream instead.
The model is a scoring component without conversational generation, so it cannot produce chatbot replies on its own. It may still help rank knowledge-base passages behind a chat model.
Vision input is supported, but the model scores image-text relevance rather than producing answers to visual questions. Use a vision-language generation model for this use case.
Query rewriting requires text generation, which this scoring-oriented reranker does not provide. It is a poor choice for this task even though it accepts text queries.
No tool-calling or agentic capability is listed for this variant, and its reranker design does not plan or invoke tools. It is unsuited to orchestration roles.
Sourced numbers, not our own evaluations. Percentiles are against the rerank models on Stav.
No benchmark source yet
curl https://api.stav.ai/v1/rerank \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $STAV_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{"model": "qwen/qwen3-vl-reranker-8b",
"query": "Which provider hosts in Norway?",
"documents": ["Green Mountain is in Stavanger.", "Paris is in France."],
"top_n": 1}'→ X-Stav-Request-Id · X-Stav-Model · X-Stav-Provider → X-Stav-Sovereignty-Level — the rung the request was served at