Loading the catalogue…
Loading the catalogue…
Xiaomi's open-weight 1.02T-parameter omnimodal reasoning model with a 1M-token context, accepting text, image, video and audio input and returning text.
Overview. MiMo-V2.6-Pro is Xiaomi's flagship reasoning model in the MiMo-V2.6 line, released in September 2026 as an open-weight checkpoint under MIT. It is a sparse Mixture-of-Experts model with roughly 1.02T total parameters and about 42B activated per token, and it accepts text, image, video and audio input while returning text. Developers reach for it when they need a long-context reasoning model they can also self-host, since the weights are published openly.
Key strengths. The model's design centre is reasoning depth paired with a 1,000,000-token context window, which makes it suitable for long source sets rather than single-shot prompts. Its released checkpoint is the '-RL' variant, trained with scaled mixed-GRPO reinforcement learning, and Xiaomi's API exposes a thinking toggle with deep thinking on by default. On the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index it scores 46, placing it in the upper-mid band rather than at the frontier. The architecture routes each token through 8 of 384 experts, which keeps active computation far below its total parameter count.
When to use it. Use this model for analysis over long inputs — extended document sets, large codebases, or multi-turn investigations — where the 1M-token context and reasoning trace both matter. It suits tasks that benefit from a written chain of reasoning before an answer, and the thinking toggle lets you turn that off when you want a faster, direct response. The combination of open weights and a permissive licence also makes it a reasonable choice when the workload must run inside your own inference environment. Its omnimodal input handling fits workflows that mix text with images, audio or video, though the response is always text.
Limitations. Output is text only, so it cannot generate images, audio or speech. Tool calling and structured output are supported — the vendor's serving recipes ship a MiMo tool-call parser with auto tool choice, and the API exposes tools, tool_choice and response_format — though no native web search is documented. While thinking mode is enabled — which is the default — custom temperature and top_p values are overridden rather than honoured. Xiaomi does not publish an official training-data cutoff, and the standard serving mode is throughput-oriented: Xiaomi sells a separate low-latency serving option for time-sensitive workloads.
Sovereignty note. MiMo-V2.6-Pro comes from Xiaomi, a China-based creator, so it falls outside US CLOUD Act reach. The weights are released under MIT and can be self-hosted on your own infrastructure, though endpoint-level data residency depends on the host serving the model.
| Inference Provider | Sovereignty | Runs in | In / out per 1M | Status | Pin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| L0 | €0.39 / 0.78 | Online |
38 use cases classified by the curator. The note says why.
Tool-calling, prompt-cache and a 1M window are the exact triad agentic coding loops need; open weights allow deployment inside controlled build environments.
1M-token context permits whole-corpus grounded answering rather than top-k retrieval stitching, with prompt-cache reducing repeat-query cost.
Long-context reasoning flagship with tool-calling suits audit trail traversal and cross-document evidence synthesis; open weights fit EU-sovereign audit workflows.
Vision input (image/video) combined with tool-calling supports screenshot-driven DOM reasoning, and the 1M context window accommodates full page trees across long sessions.
Extended-thinking reasoning over 1M-token context supports tracing defects across large codebases; vision helps parse stack traces in screenshots.
Native vision plus extended-thinking reasoning is exactly the profile for interpreting and explaining charts; open weights allow self-hosted visual analytics.
Able but expensive per-token for classic classification workloads; better reserved for classification tasks that genuinely need long-context reasoning.
Configurable reasoning effort and enormous output budget suit long narrative work, but reasoning-tier models often underperform dedicated creative-tuned alternatives on voice and style.
Tool-calling and 1M context support knowledge-base-grounded support, but the 1.02T MoE flagship is cost-heavy for high-volume chat versus smaller variants like Flash.
Reasoning-tier model suited to interpretive analysis, but no code-execution or tabular-specific benchmark is listed; pair with a tool runner.
Competent long-context extraction, but a 1.02T reasoning flagship is over-provisioned versus smaller fine-tuned extractors for high-volume entity tagging.
Capable extraction model, but redaction demands high-recall consistency that dedicated small classifiers typically deliver at lower cost; 42B active is overkill for the task.
No TTS capability in the model card; multimodal scope is limited to vision, not audio.
No audio-input capability is listed; the model is text + vision only, so speech-to-text is out of scope.
The model accepts audio input but exposes no speech-synthesis capability, so it cannot drive the full duplex turn loop a voice agent requires without an external TTS stage.
No audio generation or voice capability — the model card lists only tool-calling, vision, extended-thinking, and prompt-cache.
Sourced numbers, not our own evaluations. Percentiles are against the whole Stav catalogue.
Computed from aa-intelligence-index, gpqa-diamond, aa-engineering-index, aa-coding-index, livecodebench, terminal-bench-v4, aa-lcr.
curl https://api.stav.ai/v1/chat/completions \
-H "Authorization: Bearer $STAV_API_KEY" \
-H "Content-Type: application/json" \
-d '{
"model": "xiaomimimo/mimo-v2-6-pro",
"messages": [{"role": "user", "content": "Hello!"}]
}'→ X-Stav-Request-Id · X-Stav-Model · X-Stav-Provider → X-Stav-Sovereignty-Level — the rung the request was served at